Are OBEs and NDEs Hallucinations?
|
By Will Hart 5/25/15
One theory that skeptics have
raised to refute the reality of NDE episodes, is the idea that they are
hallucinations produced by the dysfunctional and/or dying brain.
First, in order to accept the premise that NDE episodes are real you have to
accept a corollary principle: consciousness is an independent entity.
After all, NDE reports make it clear that the people reporting them have
thoughts, memories, emotions, and sight even though the person is outside of
his/her body.
At its core the NDE is based
upon an out-of-body experience (OBE).
In
fact, this is a key stumbling block for skeptics who maintain that consciousness
is rooted in the brain; moreover, the scientific view is that it is simply a
by-product of brain function.
Given that they believe this paradigm then it
follows that, in their view, consciousness is dependent upon the brain and
therefore cannot leave the body and function independently.
The following direct quote was taken from the
Skeptic's Dictionary:
'Skeptics,
on the other hand, believe that NDEs can be explained by neurochemistry and are
the result of brain states that occur due to a dying, demented, extremely
stressed, or drugged brain. For example, neural noise and retino-cortical
mapping explain the common experience of passage down a tunnel from darkness
into a bright light''
In other words, dysfunctional brain states produce all the sensations described
in OBE/NDE reports. This explanation is consistent with the theory that
consciousness, is produced by and located in the brain, which means it cannot
exit the body or exist as an independent entity.
This thesis has several problems A) the reality of remote viewing, which has
been documented through a number of long- term scientific studies and B) reports
of people leaving their bodies, in the ER or operating theater, and observing
the doctors and nurses performing various procedures while they were either
unconscious, comatose or virtually dead.
In the first case the remote viewing phenomena involves a conscious subject
viewing objects, places or events at a distance. Scientific studies into this
phenomenon were conducted at Stanford University for almost 20 years. (1) Blind
and double-blind experiments were carried out by other researchers, which
verified the results. (2, 3)
It
is somewhat surprising that NDE investigators do not often refer to these
studies as substantiation that consciousness can leave the body. Remote viewing
involves conscious subjects travelling to distant locations to identify objects;
though that cannot be used to prove the reality of NDE episodes, it does support
the reality of the OBE.
Then in the case of people leaving their bodies, either during operations or
while undergoing CPR, we find the following Skeptic explanation:
'Some
people who are thought to be dead, but are actually just unconscious, recover
and remember things like looking down and seeing their own bodies being worked
on by doctors and nurses. They recall conversations being held while they were
"dead." Of course, they weren't dead at all, but they feel as if their mind or
soul had left their body and was observing it from above. (The Skeptics
Dictionary)
This is a patently incorrect and misleading
interpretation of what is actually going on, in strict medical terms, in an ER
or during a CPR event or an operation. The author dismisses the critical nature
of the event by implying that the person is somehow conscious because they are 'just unconscious'.
We are going to examine what doctors and nurses mean by unconscious, in the
context of CPR procedures, and what comatose and dead mean, after finishing with
the Skeptic explanation,
'Those who have had such experiences--and they are many--often find them
life-altering and defining moments. They are convinced such experiences are
proof of life after death by a disembodied consciousness. But are they? It is
possible that a person may appear dead to our senses or our scientific equipment
but still be perceiving.'
The Skeptic that authored the above, is actually going so
far as to question the competency of doctors and nurse --
as well as the efficacy of modern medical
technology -- to determine when a person is in the throes of death, totally
unconscious and unresponsive, and comatose or dead.
Those states not only imply, they automatically mean there is no conscious
perception.
In other words, the heart stopping, the lack of a
pulse, the flat-lining on the monitor does not really mean what it means,
according to the above Skeptic. All of those measurements, which ER personnel
rely on, can be tossed aside because the 'person
may appear dead to our senses or scientific equipment''
It is an absurd, obviously self-serving argument without any scientific basis,
and it is odd that the supposed scientifically-oriented Skeptic would so totally
contradict medical science and technology, just to make a case against OBE/NDE
episodes.
Here we have to delve into how the brain actually works and what happens when it
is deprived of blood supply, which delivers oxygen. The human brain requires a
constant supply of not only oxygen but glucose to fuel its many physiological
activities and functions.
If the heart stops pumping and the bloodstream ceases to deliver fresh oxygen
and glucose for even a few minutes brain cells die, and the brain starts
shutting down. The brain, is an expensive organ to run, it uses 25% of all the
oxygen in the body and 20% of the glucose, the body's main fuel source.
This is why the ER team immediately checks for a pulse, a
heartbeat, breathing and blood pressure, when a heart attack patient is
presented. If
the heart is not beating, breathing has stopped the person flat-lines and codes,
the ER unit moves into full CPR mode.
Everyone
knows that they are in a race- against- time. The brain can survive undamaged
for up to 6 minutes after the heart stops. There are two things that the brain
cannot do, store oxygen or glucose. It has to have a constant supply of both.
Without them the first thing it does is to get dizzy and then groggy.
Several things happen during this process. The cardiac patent loses
consciousness and may go into a comatose state. Anyone that has ever fainted for
whatever reason, due to low pressure or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for
instance, knows what this feels like.
When
you slip into unconsciousness it is accompanied by sensations of mental
dullness, loss of alertness, blurred vision, confusion and so forth. When an ER
team defines someone as unconscious that means they have shined a light into
their eyes and tested the response to pain stimulus, etc.
If the pupils and nerves do not respond normally then the person is deemed
unconscious; even in that state, which is not brain-death, a patient is not
conscious of their surroundings and they do respond to stimuli.
Once
the brain is deprived of oxygen and glucose it is no longer capable of
functioning normally. A person lying unconscious in the ER or operating room is
not going to be able to describe the doctors, nurses and procedures because they
are, in fact, unconscious.
That leaves the Skeptic in an uncomfortable position because he knows that
people have claimed to observe such procedures during out of body experiences.
Those claims were subsequently confirmed by the attending medical staff.
For example,
during the pilot phase of a study in the Netherlands, in one of the hospitals
involved, a coronary-care-unit nurse reported a veridical out-of-body experience
of a resuscitated patient: (4)
"During
a night shift an ambulance brings in a 44-year-old cyanotic, comatose man into
the coronary care unit...'
In laymen's terms, this mean
the man had already turned blue and was entirely unresponsive to any kind of
stimuli. In short, if CPR was not applied immediately he was going to die very
soon.
'After admission, he receives artificial respiration without intubation,
while heart massage and defibrillation are also applied. When we went to
intubate the patient, he turns out to have dentures in his mouth. I remove these
upper dentures and put them onto the 'crash car'. Meanwhile, we continue
extensive CPR. After about an hour and a half the patient has sufficient heart
rhythm and blood pressure, but he is still ventilated and intubated, and he is
still comatose.
'
What we are looking at here
is a man at death's doorstep being kept alive by artificial means. He was not
somehow magically, consciously unconscious. He had turned blue due to lack of
oxygen and was completely comatose. The use of the ventilator means that he
wasn't even breathing on his own.
He
never consciously saw the nurse; his pupils were not even functioning. He lacked
any and all normal response to stimuli and was thus classified as comatose.
Fortunately, they managed to revive him and he was transferred to the intensive
care unit for continued artificial respiration.
'Only
after more than a week do I meet again with the patient, who is by now back on
the cardiac ward. I distribute his medication. The moment he sees me he says:
'Oh, that nurse knows where my dentures are'.
I am very surprised. Then
he elucidates:
'Yes, you were there when
I was brought into the hospital and you took my dentures out of my mouth and put
them onto that car, it had all these bottles on it and there was this sliding
drawer underneath and there you put my teeth.'
I
was especially amazed because I remembered this happening while the man was in
deep coma and in the process of CPR.'
There
is no medial explanation for this man's awareness of the nurse's appearance and
her actions, while he was comatose. Moreover, it calls the theory that
consciousness is rooted in the brain into serious question.
'When I asked further, it
appeared the man had seen himself lying in bed, that he had perceived from above
how nurses and doctors had been busy with CPR. He was also able to describe
correctly and in detail the small room in which he had been resuscitated as well
as the appearance of those present like myself''
This proves that OBE observations are not the product of a dysfunctional brain
that is hallucinating. The patient accurately described things that he did not
perceive with his sensory perceptions or conscious brain prior to being revived
by the ER unit.
In fact, Skeptics know this full well and really have no explanation for it.
This is why they tend to dodge the issue or fabricate false inferences as
described above. The foregoing case took place at a hospital that happened to be
involved in a long-term study of the out of body experiences of heart attack
victims.
There is another well-known case that serves to
corroborate the thesis that consciousness exists as an independent entity.
Pam Reynolds was actually put to death in the hospital
deliberately.
This was necessary because
she had to undergo a rare operation, to remove
a giant
basilar artery aneurysm in
her brain, which threatened her life.
The size and location of the aneurysm precluded its safe removal using the
normal brain surgery techniques. Pam was referred to a doctor
who had pioneered a risky surgical procedure known
as hypothermic
cardiac arrest.
It allowed Pam's aneurysm to be removed with a reasonable chance of success.
This operation required that Pam's body temperature be lowered to 60 degrees,
her heartbeat and breathing stopped; her brain waves flattened; and the blood
drained from her head.
When
the operation commenced Pam's consciousness separated from her body. In her own
words,
'The
next thing I recall was the sound: It was a Natural
"D." As
I listened to the sound, I felt it was pulling me out of the top of my head. The
further out of my body I got, the more clear the tone became. I had the
impression it was like a road, a frequency that you go on.
(For clarification, Pam was
a musician so she naturally uses a musical note as a metaphor.)
'... I remember seeing several things in
the operating room when I was looking down. It was the most aware that I think
that I have ever been in my entire life ...I was metaphorically sitting on [the
doctor's] shoulder. It was not like normal vision. It was brighter and
more focused and clearer than normal vision ... There was so much in the
operating room that I didn't recognize, and so many people.'
In fact, there is no way
that Pam could have known what was going on during the operation through here
senses or brain, she was virtually dead or as close to full, clinical death as
is possible. Like almost all NDE reporter's she notes that the OBE experience is
hyper- real. She continues to observe the surgical procedure from a detached
point above.
'The
saw-thing that I hated the sound of looked like an electric toothbrush and it
had a dent in it, a groove at the top where the saw appeared to go into the
handle, but it didn't ... And the saw had interchangeable blades, too, but these
blades were in what looked like a socket wrench case ... I heard the saw crank
up.
Someone said something about my veins and arteries being very small. I believe
it was a female voice and that it was Dr. Murray, but I'm not sure. She was the
cardiologist''
After the operation was successfully completed and she
regained full physical awareness she told the doctors and nurses what she had
observed. They confirmed her report with a mix of disbelief and shock.
We are not, in this short paper, trying to prove the reality of NDE episodes.
Instead we are focused on the proven reality of OBE episodes. Those include
cross-substantiation between conscious, remote viewing cases reported in the
scientific literature, and unconscious, out- of- body perception (OBE) cases.
In fact, the existence of the NDE phenomenon is predicated upon the reality of
OBE episodes. From the author of this paper's perspective, the focus of research
into NDE episodes ought to be on the prerequisite OBE phenomenon until that is
sufficiently established in scientific terms.
References
1.
Stanford University,
Stanford Research Institute: Targ, Russel; 'Limitless
Mind: A Guide to Remote Viewing'. Putoff Hal; the
Stargate Project
2.
American Institutes for Research;
'An Evaluation of Remote Viewing:
Research and Applications',
Mumford, Rose, Goslin, 1995
3.
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Department,
'Precognitive
Remote Viewing in the Chicago Area: A Replication of the Standford Experiment,
Dunn, Brenda and, Bisaha, John